35 results, showing 1 to 20
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has accepted a court enforceable undertaking from ANZ Roofing Pty Ltd (ANZ Roofing) and one of its directors, Mark Lee Burtenshaw (Burtenshaw).
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has accepted a court enforceable undertaking from Ivy Contractors Pty Ltd (Ivy Contractors) and its sole director Brent Cameron Callan-Kerkenezov (Kerkenezov).
On 20 November 2019, Australia Post provided the ACCC with a price notification proposing price increases for its ‘ordinary’ letter services to apply from 2 January 2020.
On 14 November 2019, the ACCC accepted an undertaking (the Undertaking) given by Terminals Pty Limited (Terminals) and Hyperion Investments Australia Pty Ltd (Hyperion) pursuant to s 87B of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) in connection with Terminals’ proposed acquisition of 100% of the shares in GrainCorp Liquid Terminals Australia Pty Ltd (the Proposed Acquisition).
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has accepted a court enforceable undertaking from Brookfield Infrastructure Group (Australia) Pty Ltd and DJP XX LLC pursuant to s 87B of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) in relation to Brookfield’s proposed acquisition of Genesee & Wyoming Inc.
On 1 November 2019, the ACCC released its final decision on the final access determinations (FADs) for the seven declared fixed line services. These FADs replace the previous FADs for the fixed line services (Final Access Determination Nos. 2 to 8 of 2015 for Fixed Line Services).
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has accepted a court enforceable undertaking from ZeniMax Media Inc, ZeniMax Europe Limited and ZeniMax Australia Pty Ltd (together, ZeniMax) in relation to misleading representations in relation to the Fallout 76 game about consumers’ statutory rights under the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) that were likely to contravene sections 18 and 29(1)(m).
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has accepted a court enforceable undertaking from Bromic Pty Ltd (Bromic) in relation to resale price maintenance conduct that contravened section 48 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (CCA).
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has accepted a court enforceable undertaking from Woolworths Group Ltd trading as BIG W (BIG W). The undertaking is in relation to claims that between at least 30 December 2016 and 30 April 2018, BIG W representatives told consumers who complained about faulty Dyson branded products that they must deal directly with Dyson to obtain a remedy if the complaint was made more than 14 days from the date of purchase.
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has accepted a court enforceable undertaking from Target Australia Pty Ltd (Target). The undertaking is in relation to claims that between at least January 2017 and August 2017, Target’s customer service staff told some consumers who complained about faulty Sony PlayStations that they had to contact Sony directly for a remedy and were not entitled to any remedy from Target because the fault had occurred after 30 days from the date of purchase.
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has accepted a court enforceable undertaking from Target Australia Pty Ltd (Target). The undertaking is in relation to claims that between at least January 2017 and August 2017, Target’s customer service staff told some consumers who complained about faulty Sony PlayStations that they had to contact Sony directly for a remedy and were not entitled to any remedy from Target because the fault had occurred after 30 days from the date of purchase.
On 8 October 2019, the ACCC issued a formal warning to NBN Co under subsection 103(4) of the Telecommunications Act 1997 (Cth) in relation to a contravention of the service provider rule set out in subsection 152BA(2) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) (CCA). The ACCC is satisfied that NBN Co contravened the service provider rule by failing to comply with the non-discrimination obligations in section 152AXD of the CCA when building fibre infrastructure and other related activities to supply wholesale business grade NBN services.
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has accepted a court enforceable undertaking from NBN Co Limited (NBN Co) in relation to its conduct in supplying wholesale business grade services and related activities. The ACCC is satisfied that NBN Co has engaged in conduct that contravened its non-discrimination obligations under 152AXD of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) (CCA).
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has accepted a court enforceable Undertaking from BVivid Pty Ltd (BVivid) in relation to:
On 22 August 2019, the ACCC announced it had accepted an undertaking (the Undertaking) given by Nutrien Ltd and its subsidiary Agrium SP Holdings Pty Limited pursuant to s 87B of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) in connection with Nurtrien's proposal to acquire (through it's Australian business Landmark) all issued shares of Ruralco Holdings Limited (the Proposed Acquisition).
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has accepted a court enforceable undertaking from Saipol Technologies Pty Ltd (ACN 159 655 651) (Saipol) in relation to claims it has made about its ‘C grade’ replacement water filter cartridges. The ACCC considers that the claims were likely to be false, misleading or deceptive in contravention of sections 18 and 29(1)(a) of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL). Saipol carries on a business in Australia as an importer, seller and specialist manufacturer of replacement water filtration products, including water filter cartridges. It mainly markets to other businesses including hospitals and universities.
Mitolo Group Pty Ltd (Mitolo) and Maranello Trading Pty Ltd (Maranello) have undertaken that they will not, for a period of 3 years from the commencement of the undertaking, enter into, or offer to enter into, any standard form contract where the contract does not expressly specify a price for the supply under the contract which exceeds $300,000, or where the contract has a duration of more that 12 months, $1 million, with a grower of commercial ware potatoes for the supply of commercial ware potatoes on terms which are less favourable overall than those set out in the template agreement at Annexure “A” to the undertaking.
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has accepted a court enforceable undertaking from Big Warehouse Pty Ltd (Big Warehouse) in relation to claims about the availability of spare parts for electrical appliances manufactured by third parties (Spare Parts), the suitability of Spare Parts and consumers’ rights to a full refund or replacement.
No results found
No results found