382 results, showing 161 to 180
On 6 August 2010, the ACCC accepted the undertaking of Ms. Sylvia Neo Shao Ling, a director of Toll holdings Ltd and/or its related bodies corporate.
Under the undertaking Ms.
On 6 August 2010, the ACCC accepted the undertaking of Mr Bruce Charles Robert Houghton, a director of Toll Holdings Ltd and/or its related bodies corporate.
Under the undertaking Mr Houghton agrees to sell down any interest he has in Asciano Limited and thereafter maintain his independence from Asciano.
On 6 August 2010, the ACCC accepted the undertaking of Ms Tse Tiang Tan, a director of Toll Holdings Ltd and/or its related bodies corporate.
Under the undertaking Ms Tan agrees to sell down any interest she has in Asciano Limited and thereafter maintain her independence from Asciano.
On 6 August 2010, the ACCC accepted the undertaking of Mr Kenneth Yeoh Boon Guan, a director of Toll Holdings Ltd and/or its related bodies corporate.
Under the undertaking Mr Yeoh agrees to sell down any interest he has in Asciano Limited and thereafter maintain his independence from Asciano.
On 6 August 2010, the ACCC accepted the undertaking of Mr Wai Keit Chaa, a director of Toll Holdings Ltd and/or its related bodies corporate.
Under the undertaking Mr Chaa agrees to sell down any interest he has in Asciano Limited and thereafter maintain his independence from Asciano.
Fitness First Australia Pty Ltd has given the ACCC an undertaking under section 87B of the Act to resolve ACCC concerns that its advertising of its "Gold Coin to Join" promotion was likely to contravene section 53C of the Act by failing to specify in a prominent way and as a single figure a single (total) price for the membership.
Fitness First has provided a section 87B undertaking that it will:
continue its FFit program for teenagers that was due to finish in May 2010 for a period of six months to 30 November 2010 at an estimated cost to Fitness First of $225,000;
publish a corrective notice in its Fitness First magazine and on its website www.fitnessfirst.com.au;
implement a trade practices compliance program
On 29 July 2010, the ACCC accepted an undertaking (the Undertaking) from Novartis AG (Novartis) in relation to its proposed acquisition of Alcon Laboratories Inc (Alcon) (the Proposed Acquisition).
Novartis and Alcon were the only suppliers of injectable miotic products in Australia.
Queensland Solar Systems (QSS) has acknowledged that claims about electricity savings and sale discounts in advertisements for photovoltaic solar panel systems were likely to have contravened sections 52, 53(c) and 53(e) of the Trade Practices Act 1974.
QSS has provided the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) with a court-enforceable undertaking, which requires QSS to publish corrective advertising notices in newspapers, an industry bulletin and on its website and to set up a trade practices law compliance program. QSS is also required to contact its past customers to inform them of the conduct and advise the ACCC of what steps it takes to resolve any complaints that may arise.
State Solar Services (SSS) has acknowledged that claims about electricity savings and sale discounts in advertisements for photovoltaic solar panel systems were likely to have contravened sections 52, 53(c) and 53(e) of the Trade Practices Act 1974.
SSS has provided the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) with a court-enforceable undertaking, which requires SSS to publish corrective advertising notices in newspapers, an industry bulletin and on its website and to set up a trade practices law compliance program. SSS is also required to contact its past customers to inform them of the conduct and advise the ACCC of what steps it takes to resolve any complaints that may arise.
The ACCC has accepted an undertaking from Intervest Global Live Pty Ltd (Intervest Global) in respect of advertisements it caused to be published on the SeekCommerical website between November 2007 and 18 February 2010. The advertisements were for Intervest Global's horse-betting software called 'Trilogics'.
Intervest Global acknowledges that representations in the advertisements were likely to be misleading or deceptive and may have breached sections 52, 55 and 59 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 for the following reasons:
Intervest Global represented that the software was a franchised business, when it was not.
Intervest Global represented that it guaranteed that customers would earn $50,000 - $70,000 from home by using the software, when it did not offer a guarantee of that nature.
Intervest Global stated that customers earned on average $56,855 in 2008 and that many customers had earned significantly more, when it had no basis for making that representation.
Intervest Global represented that many customers had been with Intervest for 10 years, when it had no basis for making that representation.
The ACCC was concerned that the advertisements misrepresented the risk of purchasing the Trilogics software by making unsubstantiated claims about its profitability and other characteristics.
Intervest Global is required to publish corrective notices on its website and to display the notice in the reception area of its premises. Intervest Global is also required to email a copy of the notice to all potential customers that responded to the advertisements.
Murray Irrigation Limited has provided an undertaking to the ACCC acknowledging that its conduct breached rule 5(1) of the Water Charge (Termination Fees) Rules 2009 because it imposed termination fees that exceeded the maximum amount authorised under the Rules.