662 results, showing 601 to 620
On 12 February 2009, the ACCC accepted the undertaking of Toll Holdings Limited ('Toll').
Under the undertaking, Toll agrees that Mr Mark Rafferty will be employed by Toll Express as a WA Mining Business Development Manager, and will not, during the term of the Toll undertakings (originally accepted on 11 March 2006), be transferred or promoted to any other position within Toll Express, Toll or its Related Bodies Corporate without the ACCC's prior written approval.
The undertaking further prohibits Toll from using confidential information that may be deployed by Mr Rafferty in his role with Toll Express.
The undertaking relates to the ACCC's approval of Toll's employment of Mr Rafferty, pursuant to clause 2.9(f) of the undertaking given by Toll to the ACCC on 11 March 2006, as varied on 18 April 2007.
Toll’s undertaking dated 11 March 2006 and the variation to that undertaking which was accepted by the ACCC on 18 April 2007, being the fifth variation to that undertaking, can be viewed on the ACCC’s website.
On 10 day of February 2009 the ACCC accepted a request to vary the undertaking provided by Video Ezy Australasia Pty Ltd on 27 May 2008.
The variation relates to the delivery of training provided under the compliance program.
The ACCC has accepted Court enforceable undertakings from ACP Magazines Ltd (ACP) concerning the publication of advertisements for mobile premium content services in its magazines which target a young readership, being Dolly, Cosmopolitan and Cleo magazines.
Mobile premium content services are services that supply content and provide for payment of services via mobile telephone accounts at a price higher than a typical telephone call or SMS.
The ACCC has accepted Court enforceable undertakings from Pacific Magazines Pty Ltd (Pacific) concerning the publication of advertisements for mobile premium content services in TV Hits and Girlfriend magazines, which target a young readership.
Between September and December 2008, TPG Internet Pty Ltd published advertisements for its Unlimited Cap Saver mobile telephone plan (Unlimited Cap Saver Plan) on television, in newspapers, and on billboards on buses, trams, major roads and train stations across Australia (TPG Advertisements).
The ACCC contends that TPG has engaged in false, misleading and deceptive conduct because the TPG Advertisements contained representations to the effect that the Unlimited Cap Saver Plan provides unlimited calls and text for $59.99 with no additional charge and is available for a purchase price of only $59.99 per month, when that is not the case.
TPG admits the TPG Advertisements contained representations about the price and the unlimited nature of the Unlimited Cap Saver Plan that may amount to contraventions of section 52, 53(aa), 53(c) and 53(e) of the Trade Practices Act 1974.
TPG has provided court enforceable undertakings to the ACCC that it will:
not, for a period of 3 years, publish an advertisement for a mobile telephone plan which states that for a specified price there will be unlimited calls and text when certain calls and text are excluded or additional charges will apply for some calls and text without including an appropriately prominent disclaimer to the effect that exceptions, terms and conditions apply;
not contravene sections 52, 53(aa), 53(c) and 53(e) for a period of 3 years;
publish a corrective notice on its website; and
implement a Trade Practices Compliance Program.