45 results, showing 21 to 40
The Commission alleged that Pepsi Co participated in conduct that potentially breached ss50 & 50A.
The Part A Competition notice dated 10 August 1998 (in force 30 September 1998) was revoked by notice issued on 14 October 1998.
The Commission alleged that Nissan had made false or misleading representations in advertising as to the (a) price; (b) style or model of patrol RX Turbo Diesel motor vehicles contrary to ss 53(e) and 53(a).
Amendments to the Co-ops by-laws raised concerns that they may be in breach of sections 45 and 46 of the TPA by (i) preventing, restricting or limiting taxi drivers from supplying taxi services otherwise than through the Co-ops radio network; and (ii) used a points or roster system to allocate jobs amongst taxi drivers.
Mobile Innovations engaged in promotional activities which raised concerns under the misleading conduct provisions of the TPA. This undertaking was given to augment an earlier 87B undertaking.
Between at least 5 May 1998 and 25 May 1998 Mr Nagel promoted via dejanews.com email news services the Money Maker scheme.
On 1 May, 1997, the Commission expressed concerns the proposed acquisition of the businesses of News research and Monitoring Perth Media by Media Monitors (WA) Pty Ltd may have the effect of substantially lessening competition in the relevant market/s for media monitoring services.
The Part A Competition notice dated 28 May 1998 (in force 5 June 1998) was:
The Commission considers Mr Wilson breached s61 of the Act by engaging in pyramid selling over the internet. The Commission also considers that such action was misleading and deceptive, contrary to s52 of the Act.
The Commission alleges that in supplying various CSIRO documents Korab: (i) engaged in conduct that is misleading or deceptive or likely to be misleading or deceptive in contravention of s52 of the Trade Practices Act; (ii) falsely represented that goods had an approval which they did not in fact possess in contravention of section 53(c) of the Act.
The Commission considered that a number of internet schemes set up by Mr. Tischler involved pyramid selling, contrary to section 61 of the Trade Practices Act. In addition, the Commission considered that Mr.
The Commission considers the Pay Two Bills promotion by Australia Post was misleading, or likely to mislead, and thus inadvertently contravened s52 of the TPA. Australia Post have agreed to a number of issues outlined in the undertaking.
The ACCC raised concerns with GIO General Limited over 2 issues: misrepresentations as to the availability of benefits offered with GIO's comprehensive motor vehicle insurance in GIO brochures and policy documents, on the GIO Internet site and by GIO sales staff; and misrepresentations about hte conditions attached to benefits offered with GIO's comprehensive motor vehicle insurance in GIO borhcures and policy documents and by GIO sales staff. GIO agreed to provide undertakings to address these issues accordingly.