35 results, showing 11 to 20
This policy sets out the ACCC’s approach to applications for immunity from proceedings initiated or authorised by the ACCC or the Office of the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (CDPP) in relation to cartel conduct, and how cooperation provided to the ACCC by cartel participants will be recognised.
These Guidelines set out the approach that the ACCC currently proposes to take following the repeal of the intellectual property-related exemption in subsection 51(3) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) (CCA).
On 6 November 2017 important reforms to the Act took effect which prohibit parties from engaging in a concerted practice that has the purpose, effect, or likely effect of substantially lessening competition.
Section 46 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 prohibits a firm with a substantial degree of market power from engaging in conduct that has the purpose, effect or likely effect of substantially lessening competition in a market.
Presents the results of the ACCC’s cross-subsidy analysis based on Australia Post’s regulatory accounts for the 2014–15 financial year.
The ACCC has a role under the Australian Postal Corporation Act 1989 (APCA) to assess whether Australia Post is cross-subsidising its non-reserved services with revenues from its reserved services.
This template is intended to provide information for the International Competition Network member competition agencies about each other’s legislation on hardcore cartels.
Presents the results of the ACCC’s cross-subsidy analysis based on Australia Post’s regulatory accounts for the 2013–14 financial year.
These guidelines set out the ACCC’s process for considering whether to make an exemption determination.
The formal definition of cross-subsidy that has developed in the economic literature comprises two tests that compare a service’s revenues to different cost concepts.