Browse public registers

Statements given to the ACCC by an NBN corporation (such as NBN Co) under section 152BEBB of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (CCA) about differences between an access agreement (AA) and a special access undertaking (SAU).

On 20 December 2017, the ACCC issued a public warning notice regarding the conduct of Digital Sourcing ApS, who previously traded as Lux International Sales ApS (LuxStyle).

On 2 March 2017 the ACCC issued a written notice to the public containing a warning about the conduct of Lux International Sales ApS.
On 27 June 2016 the ACCC issued a written notice to the public containing a warning about the conduct of AUSTRALIAN BUSINESS FUNDING CENTRE PTY LTD (also known as Australian Business Finance Centre or ABFC).
The ACCC announced on 25 March 2004 that it had accepted an access undertaking lodged by Telstra Multimedia Pty Ltd on 23 December 2003 in relation to the provision of the declared analogue subscription television broadcast service.
On 13 December 2013, the ACCC accepted a special access undertaking lodged by NBN Co Limited (ACN: 136 533 741) on 19 November 2013. This undertaking is given in respect of the NBN Access Service and the Ancillary Services as described in the undertaking.

Safety Compliance Pty Ltd

7 November 2011

On 7 November 2011 the ACCC issued written notices to the public containing a warning about the conduct of Safety Compliance Pty Ltd.

Murrumbidgee Irrigation Limited has provided an undertaking to the ACCC acknowledging that its conduct breached rule 5(1) of the Water Charge (Termination Fees) Rules 2009 because it imposed termination fees that exceeded the maximum amount authorised under the Rules.
On 20 August 2010 the ACCC issued a written notice to the public containing a warning about the conduct of Halkalia Pty Ltd, Heartlink Enterprises Pty Ltd and National Semi-Retired Group Pty Ltd.
Murray Irrigation Limited has provided an undertaking to the ACCC acknowledging that its conduct breached rule 5(1) of the Water Charge (Termination Fees) Rules 2009 because it imposed termination fees that exceeded the maximum amount authorised under the Rules.