Browse public registers

On 26 February 2021, Lynham Networks (trading as Lightning Broadband) provided written notice to the ACCC electing to be bound by the class exemption under section 143A of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
On 7 September 2020, Real World Networks provided written notice to the ACCC electing to be bound by the class exemption under section 143A of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
On 28 August 2020, Connected Australia provided written notice to the ACCC electing to be bound by the class exemption under section 143A of the Telecommunications Act 1997.
On 18 September 2018, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission issued its determination relating to an access dispute between Port of Newcastle Operations and Glencore Coal Assets Australia. This access dispute concerned access charges and other conditions of access to the ‘declared’ shipping channel service at the Port of Newcastle.
The ACCC announced on 25 March 2004 that it had accepted an access undertaking lodged by Telstra Multimedia Pty Ltd on 23 December 2003 in relation to the provision of the declared analogue subscription television broadcast service.
On 13 December 2013, the ACCC accepted a special access undertaking lodged by NBN Co Limited (ACN: 136 533 741) on 19 November 2013. This undertaking is given in respect of the NBN Access Service and the Ancillary Services as described in the undertaking.
The ACCC has decided to publish the following determinations about the terms of access to the line sharing service (LSS). In December 2010 the ACCC decided to publish final determinations and statements of reasons in relation to two LSS access disputes.
Murrumbidgee Irrigation Limited has provided an undertaking to the ACCC acknowledging that its conduct breached rule 5(1) of the Water Charge (Termination Fees) Rules 2009 because it imposed termination fees that exceeded the maximum amount authorised under the Rules.
Murray Irrigation Limited has provided an undertaking to the ACCC acknowledging that its conduct breached rule 5(1) of the Water Charge (Termination Fees) Rules 2009 because it imposed termination fees that exceeded the maximum amount authorised under the Rules.