Browse public registers

This statement of differences was given to the ACCC on 25 January 2012 by NBN Co in respect to an access agreement entered into by Platform Networks Pty Ltd with NBN Co.
This statement of differences was given to the ACCC on 25 January 2012 by NBN Co in respect to an access agreement entered into by Aurora Energy Pty Ltd with NBN Co.
This statement of differences was given to the ACCC on 25 January 2012 by NBN Co in respect to an access agreement entered into by iiNet Limited with NBN Co.
This statement of differences was given to the ACCC on 25 January 2012 by NBN Co in respect to an access agreement entered into by ispONE Pty Ltd with NBN Co.

On 9 September 2011, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) received a price notification (a locality notice) from Airservices Australia (Airservices) under subsection 95Z(5) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) (CCA).

On 22 August 2011, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) received a price notification (a locality notice) from Airservices Australia (Airservices) under subsection 95Z(5) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) (CCA).

On 3 June 2011, Australia Post submitted a price notification to the ACCC under subsection 95Z(5) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 which proposed increases in the prices of its bulk mail letter services.

On 17 September 2010 the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) decided to object to Sydney Airport Corporation Limited’s (SACL’s) proposal to increase charges for the provision of certain aeronautical services to regional air services at Sydney (Kingsford Smith) Airport.

Murrumbidgee Irrigation Limited has provided an undertaking to the ACCC acknowledging that its conduct breached rule 5(1) of the Water Charge (Termination Fees) Rules 2009 because it imposed termination fees that exceeded the maximum amount authorised under the Rules.
Murray Irrigation Limited has provided an undertaking to the ACCC acknowledging that its conduct breached rule 5(1) of the Water Charge (Termination Fees) Rules 2009 because it imposed termination fees that exceeded the maximum amount authorised under the Rules.