The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has accepted a court enforceable undertaking from Outdoor Supacentre Pty Ltd (trading as 4WD Supacentre) in relation to claims about was/now pricing that were likely to contravene section 29(1)(i) of the Australian Consumer Law.
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has accepted a court enforceable undertaking from ANZ Roofing Pty Ltd (ANZ Roofing) and one of its directors, Mark Lee Burtenshaw (Burtenshaw).
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has accepted a court enforceable undertaking from Ivy Contractors Pty Ltd (Ivy Contractors) and its sole director Brent Cameron Callan-Kerkenezov (Kerkenezov).
On 14 November 2019, the ACCC accepted an undertaking (the Undertaking) given by Terminals Pty Limited (Terminals) and Hyperion Investments Australia Pty Ltd (Hyperion) pursuant to s 87B of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) in connection with Terminals’ proposed acquisition of 100% of the shares in GrainCorp Liquid Terminals Australia Pty Ltd (the Proposed Acquisition).
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has accepted a court enforceable undertaking from Brookfield Infrastructure Group (Australia) Pty Ltd and DJP XX LLC pursuant to s 87B of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) in relation to Brookfield’s proposed acquisition of Genesee & Wyoming Inc.
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has accepted a court enforceable undertaking from ZeniMax Media Inc, ZeniMax Europe Limited and ZeniMax Australia Pty Ltd (together, ZeniMax) in relation to misleading representations in relation to the Fallout 76 game about consumers’ statutory rights under the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) that were likely to contravene sections 18 and 29(1)(m).
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has accepted a court enforceable undertaking from Bromic Pty Ltd (Bromic) in relation to resale price maintenance conduct that contravened section 48 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (CCA).
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has accepted a court enforceable undertaking from Target Australia Pty Ltd (Target). The undertaking is in relation to claims that between at least January 2017 and August 2017, Target’s customer service staff told some consumers who complained about faulty Sony PlayStations that they had to contact Sony directly for a remedy and were not entitled to any remedy from Target because the fault had occurred after 30 days from the date of purchase.
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has accepted a court enforceable undertaking from Woolworths Group Ltd trading as BIG W (BIG W). The undertaking is in relation to claims that between at least 30 December 2016 and 30 April 2018, BIG W representatives told consumers who complained about faulty Dyson branded products that they must deal directly with Dyson to obtain a remedy if the complaint was made more than 14 days from the date of purchase.
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has accepted a court enforceable undertaking from Target Australia Pty Ltd (Target). The undertaking is in relation to claims that between at least January 2017 and August 2017, Target’s customer service staff told some consumers who complained about faulty Sony PlayStations that they had to contact Sony directly for a remedy and were not entitled to any remedy from Target because the fault had occurred after 30 days from the date of purchase.
