The Full Federal Court issued orders yesterday declaring that Baxter Healthcare Pty Ltd had breached the misuse of market power and the exclusive dealing provisions of the Trade Practices Act 1974 when it entered long term contracts with state purchasing authorities.
The contracts related to bundling the supply of sterile fluids with peritoneal dialysis products used by people with kidney failure.
The court found that Baxter, which is the sole supplier of sterile fluids, had taken advantage of its market power in sterile fluids to structure the terms on which it offered to enter into contracts for the supply of these products to the purchasing authorities in NSW, Queensland, South Australia, and Western Australia.
Baxter required the authorities to also purchase peritoneal dialysis products (a market in which Baxter faced competition) if they wished to have the benefit of significantly lower prices.
The court found that Baxter's purpose in leveraging its market power in sterile fluids was to deter or prevent competitors from being competitive in the supply of peritoneal dialysis products in contravention of section 46 of the Act.
The court also found that the bundling of all of sterile fluids and peritoneal dialysis products into long term exclusive contracts with purchasing authorities in NSW, Queensland, South Australia, and Western Australia contravened the exclusive dealing provisions of the Act.
It found that Baxter engaged in this conduct for the purpose and with the effect or likely effect of substantially lessening competition in the peritoneal dialysis products market in contravention of section 47 of the Act.
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, Chairman, Mr Graeme Samuel, said the ACCC welcomes the decision.
"The ACCC took these proceedings following a complaint from a medical practitioner that exclusivity agreements between the government and Baxter limited the choice of treatment which would best meet the needs of their patients.
"While bundling of itself is not necessarily a problem, companies need to be careful when bundling the supply of their products, to seek an advantage over their competitors, that they do not fall foul of misuse of market power and exclusive dealing provisions of the Act.
"Baxter has said that it was only responding to tenders as sought by various governments but let me be clear, it was Baxter's purpose and its alone to deter or prevent competitors from being competitive by its bundling strategy and to lessen competition. And it's not to be forgotten that this did lessen competition," Mr Samuel said.
As noted in the judgement of Justice Gyles:
"In each negotiation, Baxter used its market power in the sterile fluids market to achieve exclusive dealing by means of bundling to endeavour to snuff out competition as it threatened in the PD fluids market." (391)
Having made declarations that Baxter's conduct contravened the Act the Full Federal Court has remitted the matter to a single judge of the Federal Court to consider the imposition of penalties and other relief.
Use this form to make a general enquiry.