Uncle Tobys (Cereal Partners Australia) pays $32,400 in penalties for alleged false or misleading representations about Uncle Tobys oats

26 November 2015

Cereal Partners Australia Pty Ltd (CPA), the manufacturer and distributor of Uncle Tobys brand oats,  has paid penalties of $32 400 in relation to alleged false or misleading representations about the protein content of certain Uncle Tobys brand oats products. This followed the issue of three infringement notices by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission.

Picture of packaging of Uncle Tobys ‘Quick Sachets’ oats
The ACCC issued the infringement notices because it had reasonable grounds to believe that CPA made false or misleading representations about the protein content of certain Uncle Tobys brand oats products, in contravention of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL).

The packaging of Uncle Tobys ‘Quick Sachets’ oats contained the statement ‘Natural Source of Protein* Superfood’, and the packaging of Uncle Tobys ‘Traditional Oats’ contained the statement ‘Naturally Rich in Protein* Superfood’.  The product packaging in each case contained the disclaimer “*when prepared with [1/2 or 2/3] cup of skim milk”, which appeared in fine print below the misleading statements.

These representations were also made in a television commercial promoting Uncle Tobys oats products, which contained a similar fine print disclaimer.

The ACCC alleged that by:

  • combining the words ‘natural source’ / ‘naturally rich’, ‘protein’ and ‘superfood’ in the statements on the packaging and in a television commercial; and
  • presenting the word ‘protein’ prominently in the centre of the front of the packet in a bright colour and in large font sizes,

CPA made false or misleading representations that the oats in these Uncle Tobys products contained a significant amount of protein, when this is not the case.

Picture of the packaging for Uncle Tobys traditional oats
The ACCC did not consider the disclaimer contained on the packaging and a similar disclaimer in the television commercial was sufficient to correct the dominant impression created by these statements and their presentation.

“Consumers should be able to purchase food products based on accurate health and composition claims. While the ACCC acknowledges that oats have many health benefits, on their own they are not high in protein, contrary to the representations made about these Uncle Tobys products,” ACCC Chairman Rod Sims said.

“Business should be aware that a fine print disclaimer is insufficient to correct or qualify a prominent representation on packaging or in advertising that is false or misleading.”

“Truth in advertising, particularly where misleading claims are made by large businesses, is a priority enforcement area for the ACCC,” Mr Sims said.

The payment of a penalty specified in an infringement notice is not an admission of a contravention of the ACL. The ACCC can issue an infringement notice where it has reasonable grounds to believe a person has contravened certain consumer protection laws.


Release number: 
MR 233/15
Media enquiries: 
Media team - 1300 138 917