Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, or APEC, is the premier forum for facilitating economic growth, cooperation, trade and investment in the Asia-Pacific region. APEC is the only inter governmental grouping in the world operating on the basis of non-binding commitments, open dialogue and equal respect for the views of all participants. Unlike the WTO or other multilateral trade bodies, APEC has no treaty obligations required of its participants. Decisions made within APEC are reached by consensus and commitments are undertaken on a voluntary basis. APEC's 21 Member Economies are Australia; Brunei Darussalam; Canada; Chile; People's Republic of China; Hong Kong, China; Indonesia; Japan; Republic of Korea; Malaysia; Mexico; New Zealand; Papua New Guinea; Peru; The Republic of the Philippines; The Russian Federation; Singapore; Chinese Taipei; Thailand; United States of America; Viet Nam. APEC was established in 1989 to further enhance economic growth and prosperity for the region and to strengthen the Asia-Pacific community. The APEC Competition policy and law Database located at http://www.apeccp.org.tw/ provides a wealth of information on the activities of member economies.
Office address
35 Heng Mui Keng Terrace SINGAPORE 119616 SINGAPORE
Mailing address
35 Heng Mui Keng Terrace SINGAPORE 119616 SINGAPORE
Update entry Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC), Global
If the details for Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC), Global are incorrect or have changed
you may use the following link to make the necessary changes:
(Please note you are about to edit information on the ACCC website not
for the website of Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC), Global . If you wish to contact Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC), Global
please visit the website listed above.)
Disclaimer
A listing on the CBD does not represent endorsement by the ACCC of the organisation listed or the services provided. The ACCC seeks to ensure CBD entries are accurate. However, the ACCC cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or currency of this information. Users should evaluate whether any organisation best suits their circumstances and seek independent advice where appropriate.
