Bundaberg Sugar Ltd and Mulgrave Mill - proposed merger of certain milling assets
Type of assessment
Informal Review
Reference
27572
Acquirer(s)
Mulgrave Mill Bundaberg Sugar Ltd
Target(s)
Not Applicable
Industry
Cane crushing and sugar production
Summary
Bundaberg Sugar Limited and The Mulgrave Central Mill Company Limited - proposed merger of sugar milling assets in far north Queensland.
Outcome of assessment
Not opposed
Total review days *
27
Commenced public review
3rd May 2007
Date completed
8th June 2007
Market definition
This proposed merger was considered within the context of the following markets:
1) A Tableland market for the acquisition of cane and supply of cane crushing services to growers within an approximate 50 kilometre radius of the Tableland mill;
2) A South Johnstone market for the acquisition of cane and supply of cane crushing services to growers within an approximate 50 kilometre radius of the South Johnstone mill;
3) A Mulgrave/Babinda market for the acquisition of cane and supply of cane crushing services to growers within an approximate 50 kilometre radius of the Mulgrave and Babinda mills;
4) A Queensland market for the acquisition of sugar exporting and marketing services;
5) A national market for the supply of molasses; and
6) A global market for the supply of raw sugar.
Competition analysis
In relation to markets 1 and 2, the ACCC considered that there has been very little, if any, actual competition between mills in these markets in the period since deregulation due to time, geographic and logistical limitations. Accordingly, the ACCC concluded that the proposed merger would result in a bare transfer of market share to the merged entity in these markets.
In relation to market 3, the ACCC considered that to the extent that there is any effect on competition in the contestable areas in this market, it will not result in any substantial lessening of competition. In particular, the ACCC considered that the mutual requirement on growers and mills to maintain good complementary working relationships, the growers' ability to switch to alternative crops and to some extent their ability to collectively bargain with mills will all act as constraints on any attempt by the merged entity to arbitrarily decrease growers' prices or reduce its quality of services.
In relation to market 4, given there is presently only limited competition in this market and deregulation has not yet made its impact felt in any significant way, the ACCC concluded that the proposed merger is unlikely to result in a substantial lessening of competition.
In relation to market 5, having regard to the insignificant amount of molasses produced by the merged entity post acquisition, the ACCC concluded that the proposed merger is unlikely to result in a substantial lessening of competition.
In relation to market 6, because of the size and the fragmented and highly competitive nature of this market, and the merged entity's relatively limited role in the market, the ACCC considered that the proposed merger is unlikely to result in a substantial lessening of competition.
The ACCC's conclusions were supported by market inquiries, which indicated that market participants are generally not concerned about the proposed merger, and rather consider that it is a necessary step towards making the Australian sugar industry viable and sustainable and competitive in the global raw sugar market.
Review timeline
Date
Event
3rd May 2007
ACCC commenced review under the Merger Review Process Guidelines
21st May 2007
Closing date for submissions from interested parties
8th June 2007
ACCC announced it would not oppose the proposed acquisition
* Total Review days = Total business days less public holidays and time during which the review was suspended.