Bid riggingBid rigging, also referred to as collusive tendering, occurs when two or more competitors agree they will not compete genuinely with each other for tenders, allowing one of the cartel members to ‘win’ the tender. Participants in a bid rigging cartel may take turns to be the ‘winner’ by agreeing about the way they submit tenders, including some competitors agreeing not to tender. Types of bid riggingCover biddingCompeting businesses choose a winner while the others deliberately bid above an agreed amount. This ensures the selected bidder has the lowest tender and also helps to establish the illusion that the lowest bid is indeed competitive. Bid suppressionA business agrees not to tender, thus ensuring that the pre-agreed participant will win the contract. Bid withdrawalA business withdraws its winning bid so that a competitor will be successful instead. Bid rotationCompetitors agree to take turns at winning business, while monitoring their market shares to ensure they all have a predetermined slice of the pie. Non-conforming bidsBusinesses deliberately include terms and conditions that they know will not be acceptable to the client. Signs of possible bid rigging in tenders to government agencies
ImpactsIf government agencies and businesses aren’t able to hold a competitive tender process, this can result in the organisation paying higher prices or receiving lower quality goods or services. If a government agency, for example, pays an inflated price for services provided by tender, these additional costs are eventually passed on to taxpayers. |
Related topics on the ACCC websiteBid rigging case studies in Cartels |